![]() Dedicated transcoders like Handbrake may give you better results. It will be somewhat slower, but you may have different options that may enhance quality.īut like I said. #Shutter encoder mac softwareAnd you can try the software renderer by deactivating Use hardware acceleration if available. I think it was something like 3hours).īut if you really want to enhance the render quality within Resolve then you definitely should activate Multi-pass encode. But in Handbrake I was able to get a very good result for H.264 and a fantastic result in H.265 (with the cost of very long render Times. No chance to make that look good with the Resolve export. Once I was asked to create a 10min long H.264 with HD resolution that should only use 30mb of space. It is not simple to use but very good when you understand what you are doing. Instead of using Resolve to create a High End H264 file I would advise you to export a high Quality Codec like DNxHR HQX 10bitor ProRes 422HQ (or better) instead and then doing the transcode into H264 or (better) H265 in some other Software like Handbrake which is free on Mac and PC. I observed that the quality of an H264 Export can vary between different Programs and in my opinion the H264 Export in Resolve is only of medium quality even in the Studio Version where you will have some more options to tweak the H264 Export. This is such a complicated topic that I can not help you in that regard. There seems to be a shift of brightness in your end result (gamma shift). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |